<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.project-management-knowledge.com/top-down-vs-bottom-up-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.project-management-knowledge.com/top-down-vs-bottom-up-planning/</link>
	<description>The Ultimate Resource for Project Managers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:05:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Swati</title>
		<link>http://www.project-management-knowledge.com/top-down-vs-bottom-up-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Swati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.project-management-knowledge.com/?p=1814#comment-97</guid>
		<description>You have presented your view point very clearly. Interesting way of writing the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have presented your view point very clearly. Interesting way of writing the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daria</title>
		<link>http://www.project-management-knowledge.com/top-down-vs-bottom-up-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Daria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 14:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.project-management-knowledge.com/?p=1814#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Great post. A blend of the two approaches is probably best in most cases, that&#039;s true. Here&#039;s another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wrike.com/projectmanagement/02/07/2008/Top-down-and-Bottom-up-Project-Management-Leveraging-the-Advantages-of-the-Two-Approaches&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; supporting this point of view. Though you might be interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. A blend of the two approaches is probably best in most cases, that&#8217;s true. Here&#8217;s another <a href="http://www.wrike.com/projectmanagement/02/07/2008/Top-down-and-Bottom-up-Project-Management-Leveraging-the-Advantages-of-the-Two-Approaches" rel="nofollow">blog post</a> supporting this point of view. Though you might be interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
